Skip to content

This translation has not been editorially reviewed yet. The German version is authoritative. Deutsche Fassung →

Responsive

How reliable are automated website checks?

An automated check is only as reliable as its protection against random findings. The audit service therefore collects every responsive finding twice per device size, with a short interval between. Only what both measurements agree on gets reported. If a result fluctuates, that's explicitly stated in the report — with the recommendation to look at the spot on a real device.

Web pages are in motion while loading

A website is in motion while it builds: images load in, fonts get swapped, reveal animations run, ad banners and embedded content appear with a delay. A single snapshot can catch the page in the middle of this motion — and then report an error that no longer exists a second later. An element briefly overhanging the edge, text that doesn't yet fit before the font swap: moments like these aren't shortcomings, they're intermediate steps of loading. Reporting them as findings sends customers hunting for errors that don't exist on the fully loaded page.

Two matching measurements support a finding

The sequence for every device size: the page loads, settles, gets measured — then the check waits briefly and measures again. For shortcomings, the cautious principle applies: only what both runs see gets counted. For the amount of text on the first screen, the higher of the two values counts — in doubt, in your website's favour, so a slow-building page gets treated fairly. If the two runs disagree on horizontal scrolling, the report claims nothing; instead, it notes that the finding fluctuates between two measurements, and recommends checking on a real device. That way, every statement in the report stays solid.

A false alarm weighs heavier than a missed finding

Behind the double measurement lies a basic stance of the measurement engine: a false alarm does double damage. It sends your agency hunting for an error that doesn't actually exist, and it devalues every other finding in the same report — once you've chased a phantom finding, you trust the real ones less too. That's why cautious rules apply throughout: only genuine horizontal scrollability counts as a scrollbar, collapsed menus never count as cut-off text, individual pixel-level edge cases are tolerated. At the same time, the opposite rule applies: an empty check is a failure, never a free pass. If a measurement fails, that's stated openly in the report, instead of appearing as a passed check.

  • Read the measured-value column in the audit report — it states what the check actually saw.
  • Take the note "verify on a real device" seriously, and open the affected page on a phone.
  • For fluctuating findings, ask your agency about animations and content that loads in afterward — they're the most common cause.
  • Compare two audit runs before commissioning major changes — a single outlier isn't a trend yet.

FAQ

Why do two website tests show different results?

Because a website is in motion while loading: images, fonts, ads, and animations appear at different times. Depending on when a test measures, it sees a different intermediate state. The audit service catches this by running every measurement twice per device size and only reporting what both runs show in agreement.

What does "finding fluctuates between two measurements" mean?

The check measured the same point twice and got different results — usually because of animations or content loading in afterward. Instead of presenting one of the two observations as fact, the report openly states the uncertainty and recommends looking at the spot on a real device. That's more honest than a claim that's only half right.

Does the double measurement miss real errors?

The double measurement filters out random hits, not persistent shortcomings: an error that genuinely sits on the page appears in both runs and gets reported. Only findings that depend on the timing of the measurement fall out — and those would often be impossible to reproduce on a real device anyway. For horizontal scrolling, the report additionally states fluctuating results openly.

Deutsche Fassung dieser Seite